Responsiveness to difference: ADA accommodations in the course of an arrest.

نویسنده

  • Robyn Levin
چکیده

When the Supreme Court heard argument in City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan in the spring of 2015, it intended to resolve a circuit split. In granting certiorari, the Court planned to clarify whether individuals with disabilities can sue police officers under the ADA if an officer fails to accommodate a disability in the course of an arrest. However, because the petitioners failed to brief the Court on that question, the portion of the case involving the ADA was dismissed as improvidently granted. Justices Scalia and Kagan were so enraged by the failure to brief on the "certworthy" question that they issued a partial dissent, refusing to issue opinions on any of the attendant issues. Nearly two years later, courts are still in tension, unable to agree on how to balance the statutory requirements for ADA compliance with the necessity of providing police the requisite leeway to keep both officers and the public safe. This Note provides an in-depth survey of existing jurisprudence, reorganizing the courts’ differing tests along clear lines. It then posits a solution: a tripartite test to be applied on a sliding scale that would require officers to afford increased accommodations to individuals with disabilities as a situation becomes more secure. Given that under the current regime individuals with untreated mental illnesses are sixteen times more likely than other citizens to be killed by police officers when stopped, a new sliding scale test would hopefully engender reforms in police departments throughout the country that could decrease the incidence of violent confrontations.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Same Struggle, Different Difference: ADA Accommodations as Antidiscrimination

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was heralded as an “emancipation proclamation” for people with disabilities, one that would achieve their equality primarily through its reasonable accommodation requirements. Nevertheless, both legal commentators and Supreme Court Justices assert that the ADA’s employment mandates distinguish the ADA from earlier antidiscrimination measures, most notab...

متن کامل

بررسی میزان آنزیم آدنوزین دآمیناز در انواع پلورال افیوژن لنفوسیتی در بیمارستان‌های فیروزگر و رسول اکرم(ص)The Survey of ADA Level in Different Lymphocytic Pleural Effusions in Firoozgar and Rasoul-e-Akram Hospitals

    Background & Aim: Adenosine deminase(ADA) can be used in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions. In countries with high prevalence of tuberculous pleural effusions, specificity and sensitivity for ADA test is high, therefore it is an integral part of a diagnostic workup of lymphocyte-rich exudative body fluids, and it is a cheap and economically cost-effective test. No study has bee...

متن کامل

Mandatory reassignment under the ADA: the circuit split and need for a socio-political understanding of disability.

Stewart, and the other Cornell Law Review editors and associates for all of their hard work and invaluable feedback. Standing at the top of the courthouse steps and telling a litigant who uses a wheelchair, "You may come in, " is a disingenuous statement of equal opportunity. Explaining to [a] deaf person that his right to participate in a trial has been met by virtue of his physical presence i...

متن کامل

Students with learning disabilities, reasonable accommodations, and the rights of colleges and universities to establish and enforce academic standards: Guckenberger v. Boston University.

In 1996, students with learning disabilities enrolled at Boston University (BU) brought a class action lawsuit in U.S. district court claiming discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other federal and state laws. In August 1997, federal district court Judge Patti B. Saris found that, in a number of significant respects, BU had violated the students' rights under the A...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Stanford law review

دوره 69 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017